In Pronatalist Zealotry
and Reproductive Rights: How Catholic Militants Seized Control of U.S.
Family Planning Programs, author Roland Van Liew reveals:
“ . . . The [Roman Catholic] Church's role in dismantling
U.S. government support for family planning and rational population policies
has been shrouded in secrecy and protected by a code of silence in the press.
But there are clear indications of a frontal assault on our political system.
There is startling new evidence that the Church wields
highly effective and illicit political influence. From: Free Inquiry, Spring
1992
Pronatalist
Zealotry and Reproductive Rights:
How
Catholic Militants Seized Control of U.S. Family Planning Programs
Roland
Van Liew
Roland Van Liew manages his own computer software business
and is an environmental activist in eastern Massachusetts.
Why is Depo-Provera, the world’s safest, most
reliable contraceptive, banned in the United States? Why does the United States
have a so-called Mexico City Policy restricting family planning assistance to
the third world? Why is RU-486, the “abortion pill,” prohibited from even being
tested in the United States?
The primary foe of reproductive rights for over a century
has been the Roman Catholic church. During the last decade in particular, the
Vatican has had staggering success in stifling family planning programs
worldwide and especially in the United States. The Church’s role in dismantling
U.S. government support for family planning and rational population policies
has been shrouded in secrecy and protected by a code of silence in the press.
But there are clear indications of a frontal assault on our political system.
There is startling new evidence that the Church wields
highly effective and illicit political influence. Saying he has “begun speaking
out more frankly,” a former top federal official has blown the whistle on the
political dealing and dirty tricks used to cripple U.S. population assistance
programs. For fourteen years, Dr. R. T. Ravenholt directed successful U.S.
efforts to help third-world countries curb their rampant population growth,
only to watch the program be systematically dismantled. In a 1991 report, Dr.
Ravenholt details how Catholic bishops and Catholic presidential appointees
planned--and largely achieved--the sabotage of U.S. family planning programs.
Dr. Ravenholt was the first director of the Agency for
International Development’s Office of Population, serving from 1966 through
1979. In 1973 he was awarded AID’s Distinguished Honor Award, “in recognition
of his distinguished leadership in development of worldwide assistance programs
to deal with the challenge of excessive population growth.”
Dr. Ravenholt writes that, in addition to dismantling
international aid, Catholic interference has deprived American women of
important new fertility control products. Two such products are Depo-Provera, a
most promising contraceptive, and RU-486, the French early abortion pill. Both
products have been found safe and effective and are being marketed abroad.
Depo-Provera has been approved for marketing in more than ninety countries,
according to Ravenholt, and has been used safely by more than 12 million women.
“It is simply intolerable in this country,” he says, “that a
minority religious sect dictates to the entire citizenry that they not have
access to fertility control means which would be highly beneficial to them.
Depo-Provera and RU-486 are urgently needed in this country and throughout the
world. A powerful groundswell of protest is needed against religious constraint
of freedom of contraceptive choice.”
In 1975 the National Conference of Catholic Bishops adopted
its “Pastoral Plan,” which outlines a comprehensive and coordinated national
program of political action. (An extensive investigation of the Pastoral Plan
and its implementation is available in several books, including American
Democracy & The Vatican: Population Growth & National Security, by
Dr. Stephen D. Mumford.) The purpose of the Pastoral Plan is to outlaw birth
control and abortion, to “shape our laws so as to protect the life of all
persons, including the unborn.” Immediately after the Pastoral Plan was
adopted, parish, diocesan, and state coordinating pro-life committees began
organizing all 435 Congressional districts in the fifty states.
Dr. Ravenholt reveals that the beginning of Catholic
domination of U.S. government-assisted family planning programs began shortly
thereafter, during the Carter administration. Catholic influence was greatly
strengthened under former President Ronald Reagan and is now firmly entrenched
under President George Bush. In his report, Dr. Ravenholt states, “Following a
meeting of Presidential candidate Jimmy Carter and his campaign staff with
fifteen Catholic leaders at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, D.C. on August
31 of 1976, on which occasion they pressed Carter to de-emphasize federal
support for family planning in exchange for a modicum of Catholic support for
his Presidential race, President-Elect Carter proceeded to put the two federal
agencies with family planning programs under Catholic control.” The - two
agencies were the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare and AID.
Joseph Califano became Secretary of Health, Education, and
Welfare, and the first to be offered the U.S. AID Administrator position was
Father Theodore Hesburgh, president of Notre Dame University. When Father
Hesburgh declined, the appointment was given to John J. Gilligan, a Notre Dame
graduate and a former governor of Ohio.
In addition, John H. Sullivan, a long time Catholic
adversary of AID’s family planning program, moved from Congressman Clement
Zablocki’s office into AID during the presidential transition and was given a
key role in selecting Carter’s political appointees. During previous years,
Congressman Zablocki and Sullivan had “persistently worked to curb AID’s
high-powered family planning program.” In 1973, aware that AID had just
developed a menstrual regulation kit that was very effective and safe, Sullivan
and allied zealots helped Senator Jesse Helms develop the Helms Amendment to
the Foreign Assistance Act to prevent mass distribution. Since then, this
amendment has also prevented AID from providing assistance for the termination
of unwanted pregnancies.
President Carter’s political appointees took various actions
to curb birth control initiatives and obstruct family planning programs. For
example, Dr. Ravenholt points out, “In 1978 after the Food & Drug
Administration already had informed the Upjohn Company that its product, Depo-Provera,
was approvable, it was HEW Secretary Joseph Califano who specifically directed
that FDA not approve Depo-Provera for marketing as a contraceptive. Thus
Califano, an otherwise able Secretary of HEW, paid his appointment dues to the
Catholic Church.”
John Sullivan was responsible for many of the top
appointments within AID, including Sander Levin, a defeated Democratic
candidate for governor of Michigan without family planning program experience.
He was appointed Assistant Administrator of AID’s Population and Humanitarian
Assistance Bureau. Levin took direct responsibility for dispersing Office of
Population personnel as desired by his superiors, and returning the program to
an administrative structure similar to that which had proven ineffective prior
to Ravenholt’s tenure. Levin appointed “special assistants” to administrate
population programs and distributed the budget to five Geographic Bureaus
instead of the Office of Population. Levin also took long, determined action to
oust Dr. Ravenholt. John Sullivan himself assumed the position of Assistant
Administrator for Asia, notwithstanding Sullivan’s particular aversion to birth
control, especially condoms, as well as abortion.
Dr. Ravenholt, as the architect of aggressive, innovative,
and successful family planning programs, became the primary target of Catholic
political operatives. In hearings of the House Foreign Affairs Committee on
July 18, 1975, Zablocki stated for the record his antipathy to contraceptives
and discussed with a Right-to-Life representative, Randy Engel, the removal of
Dr. Ravenholt. “I would hope that we could find a way of removing him.” Sander
Levin and others aggressively attacked Dr. Ravenholt before the Merit System
Protection Board. After several years of harassment, Ravenholt accepted
transfer to the role of Director, World Health Surveys, Centers for Disease
Control. Since then, AID’s dismembered family planning program has suffered
continuing harassment from the Reagan-Bush administrations and anti-birth
control zealots, and has been far less effective than it otherwise could have
been.
We do not have such clear inside information on the deals
made by George Bush, but the public record is interesting indeed. Before
running for the presidency in 1979, Bush was a strong advocate of family
planning programs both as a U.S. congressman and as U.S. representative to the
United Nations. Bush’s own father lost re-election to the U.S. Senate in 1950
by just a few hundred votes when columnist Drew Pearson, on the Sunday before
Election Day, “revealed” that Bush’s father was involved with Planned
Parenthood. The lesson was not lost on son George, who sold his soul to the
religious right in order to gain the presidency.
“Although it is appropriate,” Ravenholt emphasizes, “for
Catholic and other religious leaders to exhort adherents and others not to use
contraceptives and other means of birth control, it is surely unacceptable to
the majority of Americans that any religious minority dictate what means of
fertility control may be used by persons of other faiths--by denying them
access to valuable products of scientific research through covert political
deals and dirty tricks.”
Besides negotiating political deals directly with presidential
candidates, the Church made sure that fanatical right-wing religious groups
such as the Moral Majority were well funded and in some cases, as with the
National Right to Life Committee, this was initiated directly by the Church.
Catholics succeeded in co opting the agenda of non-Catholic organizations such
as the Moral Majority by offering generous financial support in return for a
strong anti-abortion position, as documented by investigative reporter Connie
Page in her book The Right to Ljfers. The Church also hides its
involvement when possible by sup porting non-Catholics for leadership of
Catholic-dominated organizations so that people become confused about who is
behind anti-family planning activities. For example, the first three presidents
of the National Right to Life Committee, an anti-abortion group created by the
Catholic church and composed primarily of Catholics, were all Protestants,
although Jack Wilike, a Catholic, became president in 1980. The National
Committee for a Human Life Amendment has no official affiliation with the
Vatican but gets the better part of its money from Catholic communicants across
the country, and so on.
Little or none of this information gets reported in the mass
media. I asked Dr. Ravenholt what the most surprising or distressing reaction
was to his report. “The code of silence,” he answered immediately. “It has been
an education to me to the extent to which the Church controls the media.”
Besides the complexity of the Vatican’s dealings, there is
certainly one forbidding reason for the lack of news coverage: The Church
effectively uses its own religious intolerance along with public cries of
“bigotry” as weapons to club anyone who criticizes its dogma or its meddling in
government affairs. A reporter writing this article for any newspaper in -
America would face enormous pressure from the Church, which has a very
effective policy of blackballing people who oppose it. Critics can quickly lose
their jobs and often their livelihood.
Leaders of major family planning organizations, especially
Planned Parenthood, have been thoroughly intimidated by the power of the
Church. The International Planned Parenthood Federation and the Planned
Parenthood Federation of America are very careful to never criticize the Church
or the pope directly. Leaders of population organizations will privately admit
that the Church is the primary source of opposition, but will not jeopardize
their funding by saying so publicly. Planned Parenthood in particular would
risk a great deal of money by confronting the source of conflict rather than
simply exploiting the controversy.
Says Ravenholt,
It
is a remarkable failure of Planned Parenthood to publicly identify their chief
adversary, the Roman Catholic church. Improved family planning made notable
progress around the world, especially the third world, in the 60's and 70's,
but has languished during the 80's until now. The lack of courage of U.S.
family planning leaders in recent years has greatly reduced the effectiveness
of the global family planning movement.
The
current code of silence with respect to identifying the main adversary of
reproductive freedom the Roman Catholic Church--is fomenting a world disaster
analogous in scope to that which would have ensued if during this century world
political leaders had failed to identify Russia as the main adversary of
democratic political freedom.
So it is left to individuals to challenge the church’s
influence on public policy. Some persons have stood firm, but they have paid a
heavy price. Bill Baird, a tireless advocate of reproductive rights and a
forthright critic of the Church’s role in denying those rights, is blocked from
a large number of speaking engagements every year by Catholic zealots. He has
been picketed by Catholic clergy arm-in-arm with the police, who are supposed
to protect his rights, has had to live apart from his family for most of the
last twenty years, and has been assaulted and firebombed several times. Dr.
Stephen Mumford, a top researcher in the field of U.S. population policy,
quickly lost his livelihood after exposing the Church’s role in defining U.S.
government policy. Catholic legislators, including senators and governors, have
been directly threatened with excommunication and political disaster if they do
not vote in line with the Vatican, but many have refused to do so. Dr.
Ravenholt, now retired from the federal service, waited to speak out until his
livelihood was no longer in danger. He has provided some of the most explosive
evidence of the Church’s power in the United States. Courageous individuals
like these are the true heroes of today’s battle for reproductive freedom.
The Church’s simultaneous opposition to birth control and
abortion is contradictory and has nothing to do with humanitarian concerns. The
Church is not effectively trying to reduce abortions. Indeed, its contradictory
policies have created an abortion rate among Catholics that is 30 percent
higher than the rate for Protestants, as shown in studies supplied by the Alan
Guttmacher Institute and Catholics for a Free Choice. The true reasons for
Vatican opposition to birth control are rooted in pronatalist power politics
aimed at greater numerical hegemony and the need to maintain authority within
the Church itself. Vatican power politics threaten reproductive rights of
nonadherents; nothing less than our civil liberties and our national security
are at stake.
Dr. R. T. Ravenholt held the position of Director of the
Office of Population, in the U.S. State Department’s Agency for International
Development (AID) from 1966 through 1979. The Ravenholt report, Pronatalist
Zealotry and Population Pressure Conflicts (twenty-six pages), is published
by the Center for Research on Population and Security (CRPS). Many of the
statements in this article are direct quotes from the report. Free copies are
available from CRPS, P.O. Box 13067, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709,
telephone 919-933-7491. Free copies of the Pastoral Plan for Pro-Life
Activities are also available from CRPS.
From:
Free Inquiry
Spring 1992
ii